Wednesday, 7 November 2012

Ashtanga Rishi Series made up of Rishi asana?

"Our ancients, the great rishis, followers of their sanatana dharma (ancient eternal path) from the beginning of time, became experts in yama, niyama, asana, pranayama, pratyahara, dharana, dhyana, and samadhi, stopped all external movements of the mind, and through the path of raja yoga attained a high state of happiness in this world and beyond. And they continue until this day to experience this. But during ancient times, all were skilled yoga practitioners and therefore had good health and strength, were blessed with a long life and were able to serve society". 
Krishnamacharya Yoga Makaranda (Mysore 1934).

*

'Originally there were five series: Primary, Intermediate, Advanced A, Advanced B, and the fifth was the “rishi” series'.
Nancy Gilgoff 'Yoga as it was'

See the Rishi Series page at the top of the blog exploring fifty breaths (or 25 each side)  in each of the Ashtanga Primary and Intermediate series asana.

Ashtanga Rishi Blog post series
Ashtanga Rishi Approach, first day Paschimottanasana to Janu sirsasana A
Ashtanga Rishi Approach, second day  Janu Sirsasana B to Navasana
Ashtanga Rishi Approach, third day Bhuja pindasana to badha konasana
Ashtanga Rishi Approach, fourth day Upavishta konasana to Supta bandhasana
Ashtanga Rishi Approach, fifth day Pasasana to Kapotasana
Ashtanga Rishi Approach, sixth day Supta vajrasana to Ardha Matsyendrasana
Ashtanga Rishi Approach, Seventh Day  Eka pada sirsasana to Tittibhasana C

Rishi series made from asana named after Rishi An alternative take on the Rishi series

See also Srivatsa Ramaswami's December 2012 newsletter for more on the Rishis
I'd like to explore this again at some time but with longer, slower breathing.


This interesting comment on one of my Rishi series posts this morning

"Astanga Yoga practitioners can recognise the names of these Rishis as many positions are named in his honor. My mentor, Manju Jois, explained the practice of a series called "Rishi Sequence", a separate series of Vinyasa in which postures are practiced only with names of Rishis."

from http://www.vaidika.com/?p=1631 (in Spanish)

So here are some pictures related to the Rishi/Sage, I chose my favourite picture from those that google  image search had to offer, most link below the picture to an interesting website with one version of a story relating to the Sage.

The Introductions to each Rishi are from Wikipedia with links for more info.

Admittedly the leg behind head postures are a bit tricky but most of the others are doable perhaps if you can manage a half lotus. I've chosen Marchi H just to make a change but standard marichyasana is relatively straight forward as is the half matsyendrasana. Kashyapasana is awkward but then you can do an unbound version, sure the Rishi won't mind too much.

The Rishi picture is followed by the posture named after the Sage.

RISHIS
from Srivatsa Ramaswami's December 2012 Newsletter


"During my long studentship with Sri Krishnamacharya, he taught several
asanas and vinyasas normally not well known at that time. Some bore
the names of renowned sages or rishis. I had known about rishis being
associated with a few asanas even earlier but these were mostly seated
poses, basically meditative postures like Vajrasana also known as
Dadhichi asana about which I had written earlier. But Sri
Krishnamacharya taught several new asanas I had not known, not even
heard of before. These were also featured in his book Yoga Makaranda.

Some like Bhardwajasana, Marichyasana are simple seated poses but many
others are more difficult ones and one may wonder if the rishi would
be able to stay for a long time in those postures and also meditate.
Of course some of the asanas were one legged poses like Bhagiratasana
and Durvasasana but I had heard  and also read in some puranas that
such one legged standing poses were resorted to by several tapasvins
to get the blessings of the Lord. The asanas named after rishis and
taught by my Guru can be classifies into simple seated meditative
poses like Dadhichi asana (vajrasana), more involved seated poses like
Bharadvajasana, Matsyendrasana, Marichyasana and others. Then we have
a few poses which can form a group like the 'side plank' poses such as
Vashishtasana, Viswamitrasana, Kasyapasana and others. Then we have a
series of poses centered around 'ekapada sirsasana' like Kapilasana.
Krishnamacharya thus taught many asanas bearing the names of well
known rishis—many of which I had not heard of, before I came to study
with him.

These Rishis were well known though, not necessarily for their
yogasana capabilities. There is a view that the entire vedas was
called Arsha or the creation of rishis, even though Sri
Krishnamacharya would say, quoting the vedas, that the vedas are
apourusheya or not created by human beings. The view is that the vedas
were created by creator Brahma when creation took place but were
dormant. The rishis with their deep contemplation were able to tune in
with the hidden vedic mantras and then gave it to human beings for
proper use and understanding. So the rishis were known as “seers of
mantras”, as Yaska the vedic etymologist would say “Rishayah
Mantradrashtarah”. But then vedas were considered revelation of the
absolute truth so another definition of a Rishi as quoted by Sri
Krishnamacharya from a well known Sanskrit thesaurus “Amarakosa” is
that Rishis are revealers of Truth (Rishayah Satyavachasah). Of course
both the definitions could amount to the same. So we can say Rishis
are those who reveal the absolute truth after they experience the
truth through the discovery of vedic mantras. Some scholars indicate
that the words Rishi, Rtam (truth), Rju (proof), Rk( vedic mantra),
Arjava (straightforwardness) can be traced to one sanskrit root “rj'
meaning 'to be straight'" .



Bhagiratha (Sanskrit: भगीरथ, bhagīratha) was a great king in Hindu mythology who brought the River Ganges, personified as the river goddess Ganga, to Earth from the heavens.
picture from here 
Bhagirathasana
Rishi Marichi or Mareechi or Marishi (ṛṣi Marīci, ऋषि मरीचि) (meaning a ray of light) is the son of Brahma, the cosmic creator, and also one of theSaptarshi (Seven Great Sages Rishi), in the First Manvantara, with others being AtriAngiras, Pulaha, Kratu, Pulastya, and Vashishtha.[1]

Picture from here
Marichyasana H
Kashyapa (Sanskrit कश्यप kaśyapa) was an ancient sage (rishis), who is one of the Saptarshis in the present Manvantara; with others being AtriVashishthaVishvamitraGautamaJamadagni,Bharadwaja [1]

picture from here
Kashyapasana

"Maharshi Kashypa is another well known vedic rishi. Reference of 
Kashyapa is found in some Buddhist literature also. Rishi Kashypa is 
mentioned along with the understanding of the solar system in the well 
known Surynamaskara portion of the vedas. ”Kashyapaf pashyako 
bhavati”. He is said to be the son of Marichi (does it ring a bell?) 
who was believed to be one of the ten 'mind children' (manasputras) of 
Brahma. Here is an interesting story about how different species were 
created. Kashyapaa married 13 women and through them were born so many 
offspring/progeny that the whole universe was filled different beings. 
Divine beings like the 12 suns (adityas), several creeds of demons, 
tigers and lions, birds like garuda (eagle), then snakes and other 
reptiles all were born to these women, each set of species to 
different wives. Kashyapa thus became the father of all beings and all 
beings of the universe were considered to be related to one another 
(not just the human beings) through a common forefather Kashyapa. Thus 
not only other human beings but all the beings belonging to all the 
species were considered kith and kin. Many families in India still 
carry his name".
from Srivatsa Ramaswami's Dec 2012 Newsletter

Bharadwaja (Sanskritभरद्वाजIAST Bharadvāja, also spelled Bhardwaj) was one of the greatest Hindu sages (Maharshis) descendant of rishi Angirasa, whose accomplishments are detailed in the Puranas. He is one of the Saptarshis (Seven Great Sages Rishi) in the present Manvantara; with others being AtriVashishthaVishvamitraGautamaJamadagniKashyapa.[1]

picture from here
Bharadwajrasana

"Sage Bharadwaja is another renowned vedic rishi. He is considered to 
be a great vedic scholar and teacher. An episode found in the Kaataka 
portion of the Taittiriya sakha of Yajur Veda would be of interest. 
Bharadwaja was so much concentrating in studying the vedas that even 
as the life was coming to an end  he was still continuing with his 
studies. Indra, the Lord appeared before him and reminded him that it 
was almost the end of his life. He told Bharadwaj, “Bharadwaja!! If I 
give you another human life what would you like to do?” Back came the 
reply, “I will study the Vedas further”. Upon that, the Lord asked him 
to look at the three huge mountains the Lord created and took out from 
each one of them a handful of earth and placed them before Bharadwaja 
and said, “These mountains represent the three vedas and the three 
handfuls of dirt in front of you represent the vedas you have studied 
so far. You see the vedas are innumerable and infinite (ananta vai 
vedaH) and any number of births would not be sufficient to exhaust all 
the vedas. You try to understand the essence of the vedas, the source 
of all the Universe, the Brahman.” And Bharadwaja became a great 
spiritual teacher of the vedas. Again many families carry the 
Bharadwaja name".
from Srivatsa Ramaswami's Dec 2012 Newsletter

Matsyendra or Matsyendranatha ( Sanskrit : मत्स्येन्द्र, Matsyendra m;. Pali : Macchanda; Hindi: Macchendranath) is a legendary Indian saint and founder of the Kaula Tantra . He was the teacher of Goraksha and probably lived in the 6th or 7 Century, but possibly also in the 10th After one century Matsyendra is Asana named: the Matsyendrasana , a simplified version of it is the Ardha Matsyendrasana .

picture from here
Purna matsyendrasana
Vashishta (Sanskritवशिष्ठThai: Vasit) is one of the Saptarishis (Seven Great Sages Rishi) in the seventh, i.e. the present Manvantara,.[1] Vashista is a manasputra of God Brahma. He had in his possession the divine cow Kamadhenu, and Nandini her child, who could grant anything to their owners. Arundhati is the name of the wife of Vashista.
picture from here
Vashishtasana
The illustrious son of Chyavana, celebrated by the name of Richika, of the race of Bhrigu, endued with austere penances, sought the hand of this lady. Gadhi, the destroyer of his enemies, thinking him to be poor, did not bestow her in marriage upon the high-souled Richika

picture from this charming Ramayana website
Richikasana also called Skandasana
Kapila (Hindi: /Nepali कपिल ऋषि) was a Vedic sage and an incarnation of Supreme Godhead Vishnu, credited as one of the founders of the Samkhyaschool of philosophy. He is prominent in the Bhagavata Purana, which features a theistic version of his Samkhya philosophy.[1] Traditional Hindusources describe him as a descendant of Manu, a grandson of Brahma. The Bhagavad Gita depicts Kapila as a yogi hermit with highly developedsiddhis, or spiritual powers.

picture from here
Kapilasana

"Kapila was a vedic rishi, and still some Indian families carry his 
name. According to Bhgavata purana he was the avatar of Lord Narayana 
Himself. His discussions and advice to his mother on spiritual matters 
known as “Kapila-devaahuti samvada” is very well known. He is credited 
with the formalization of the Samkhya philosophy. It was also known as 
Seswar Samkhya. He is also credited with the Samkhya Sutras one of the 
earliest works on Samkhya even as Iswarakrishna's Samkhyakarika became 
the standard text for Samkhya philosophy. Kapila also is associated 
with the story of how the Ganga was brought to earth from the lofty 
heights of the Himalayas by Bhagirata. Please read the story of 
Bhagirata in an earlier Newsletter".
from Srivatsa Ramaswami's Dec 2012 Newsletter


In Hindu mythology, Durvasa (दुर्वास in Devanagari or durvāsa in IAST, pronounced [d̪urʋɑːsɐ] in classical Sanskrit), or Durvasas, was an ancient sage, the son of Atri and Anasuya. He is supposed to be an incarnation of Shiva.[1][2][3][4][5] He is known for his short temper. Hence, wherever he went, he was received with great reverence from humans and Devas alike.[1]

Picture from here
Durvasana
Ashtavakra (Sanskritअष्टावक्रःIAST Aṣṭāvakra) is a sage mentioned in Hindu scriptures. He is described as one born with deformities in eight limbs of the body (two feet, two knees, two hands, the chest and the head). In SanskritAshtavakra means "one having eight bends". Ashta (IAST Aṣṭa) means eight, while Vakra means bend or deformity. Ashtavakra is the author of the work Ashtavakra Gita, also known as Ashtavakra Samhita, a treatise on the instruction by Ashtavakra to Janaka about the Self. Ashtavakra is the Guru of the king Janaka and the sage Yajnavalkya.

picture from here
Ashtvakrasana

Supposedly the Rishi series as explained to David Williams by Shri K Pattabhi Jois was ten postures held for a longer period than usual. 

Here are some extra arm balances named after sages, these are in Iyengar but not Ramaswami, familiar to Ashtangi's however.

Brahmarshi Vishvamitra (Sanskritविश्वामित्र viśvā-mitra "friend of the world"; Kannadaವಿಶ್ವಾಮಿತ್ರMalayalamവിശ്വാമിത്രൻTeluguవిశ్వామిత్రTamil:விஸ்வாமித்திரன் Visvāmittiraṉ; ThaiSwamitBurmeseBodawJavaneseWiswamitra) is one of the most venerated rishis or sages of ancient times inIndia. He is also credited as the author of most of Mandala 3 of the Rigveda, including the Gayatri Mantra.
picture from here
Visvamitrasana

"Vasishta and Viswamitra are two renowned vedic rishis. I have already 
written about these two in an earlier article “Yogagate”. Viswamitra 
is credited with revealing one of the most important mantras of the 
vedas, the Gayatri which is used by thousands everyday and is the 
mantra used lifelong by many. Viswamitra also is credited with 
teaching a pair of important mantras to Lord Rama (and Lakshmana), 
known as balaa and atibalaa mantras in the Ramayana. If one masters 
the bala mantra one would not tire during a war and the atibala would 
protect the disciple from thirst and hunger while on the battlefield. 
Again many families still carry the name of Vasishta and Viswamitra's 
earlier name Kausika".
from Srivatsa Ramaswami's Dec 2012 Newsletter

Kaundinya (Sanskrit: कौण्डिन्यKauṇḍinyaPaliKondañña) also known as Ajnata Kaundinya (Sanskrit: अज्ञात कौण्डिन्यĀjñātakauṇḍinyaPaliAñña Kondañña) was a Buddhist bhikkhu in the sangha of Gautama Buddha and the first to become an arahant. He lived during the 6th century BCE in what is now Uttar Pradesh and BiharIndia.

picture from here
Koundinyasana B
And put altogether on one sheet. Not keen on spending twenty-five to fifty breaths in all these but then as I wrote in my reply to the comment, perhaps Manju was joking, or his father was or perhaps Krishnamacharya teasing or perhaps they were all seeking to silence the yoga student asking 'What next' after Advanced B

Still, can't wait to give it a try tomorrow no doubt with a few Sury's and some standing followed by a finishing sequence along the lines of Krishnamacharya's 'Life saving' sequence.

----------------------

see also this
Richard Rosen article on names of postures
http://www.piedmontyoga.com/uploads/1/0/6/6/10664798/rosen_asana_names_hindu_gods.pdf

UPDATE

Anon has commented on this post ( and I'm guessing the original quote at the beginning of the post is from the same Anon), pointing out that many of the asana in the Krishnamacharya's Yogasanagalu are named after Rishi and Deities.


"Looks that half of this series has names rishi in proficient, perhaps follow the order of the series and support 10 rishi by 50 breaths per session

in said yogasanagulu
bairangha external sadhana
antarangha internal sadhana
paratmanga sadhana is only one

might want to say about aspiring to be yoga rishi

hold this position deve be deve difiil good health is to teach Krishnamacharya could generate the interest and devotion to the rishi and meditate on the personal deity
and bring the state

Perhaps this was the intention of the outer KRISHANAMCHARYA to peace only one end?"


Tuesday, 6 November 2012

Part 1. A Short Introduction to Yoga Philosophy from Srivatsa Ramaswami's Nov. Newsletter

I thought Ramaswami's newsletter this month was a useful introduction to Yoga philosophy but am aware too that we often read blog posts 'on the fly', here's the newsletter article divided up into three bite size pieces.
Pictures and format is mine.


Indian cosmological paining from here


Part One

CHITTAVRITTI — AN ILLUSION? 

Twinkle Twinkle Little Star 
How I wonder what you are. 


In childhood everything is a wonderment. There are so many things to know, to experience, to see, to search -- like the stars, God. 

When I was a child, I had an uncle (my paternal aunt's husband) who  was living in a small town in deep south India. We were living in Madras about 400 miles away. Many relatives and family friends used to visit us, every now and then and my uncle also used to visit us.  Usually in India the elders do not spend much time with children but  this person used to spend considerable time with us. We used to like  him. One evening my parents suddenly left Madras to his town, leaving us in the care of my grand aunt. My uncle had suddenly died. When my grand aunt told us that my uncle died I did not fully comprehend it  and she started explaining following the general belief in India that he had gone to heaven. I would ask questions like if he had reached haven already, she would say that he would be traveling and would reach there in about 9 days or so and then he would reach God and be with him. She would assure us that we should not worry about him as God would take care of him. I remember my grand aunt pointing her finger up the sky where she said heaven was. I used to run out of the house and look up to see if I could see heaven. And heaven I learnt is 
above the sky, one has to see beyond the sky--up above the sky I guessed. 

Like this when we are young, a lot of questions arise in the mind like how the world came into existence, why and how we are born, about reincarnation and many more. Then as we get older, all these questions remain in the background unanswered. The care about family, career and the concerns about keeping the head above water consume all our time and attention. A few however keep these wonderment queries alive. Did  a Super-being create the Universe or did it come about by itself, evolved by itself. Can one identify oneself in the purest form and answer the  question “Who  am I, what am I made of?” Is there any principle which  does not undergo any change and hence is eternal or do all things change and are subject to time? “Is it always nature's law to change and constancy alone is strange?” 

And there are very powerful, compelling but competing theories, premises and speculations about these questions. So one finds over time that it is prudent not to spend time trying to find convincing answers to all these questions.These appear to be trivial questions and we turn our attentions thereafter to trivia. 

While the puranas of ancient times describe in great detail how the Supreme Being created the Universe, there are also theories which find it unnecessary to bring in a Supreme Intelligent Being to create the Universe, like the Samkhyas and the Yogis piggybacking on  the Sankhya framework. The Sankhyas say that the entire universe  evolved out of a primordial atomic entity called mulaprakriti  made of three essential characteristics,  called satwa (order), Rajas (energy) and tamas (disorder/chaos) in perfect equilibrium. Firstly with the equilibrium disturbed by the dominance of Satwa, the first stage of evolution called Mahat or Universal Intelligence emerges. In it then Rajas raises its head to evolve the next tatwa called Ahamkara or what may be termed as Universal Ego. Then the Samkhyas thoughtfully say that from Ahamkhara emanate  two streams of evolution, one the microcosmic the other macro cosmic. The satwic aspect of Ahamkara starts the microcosmic stream, leads to eleven  indriyas, the five sense  and five motor organs along with the coordinating agency called manas.  On the other side, the tamasic aspect of ahamkara leads to five sensations or tanmatras (touch, form etc) which in turn produce the five bhutas or the gross elements like earth, water, etc. The  intellect (buddhi), the ahamkara, the 11 senses (13 in all) form the subtle body. The three principles buddhi(mahat), ahamkara and manas are also called antahkarana or the internal organ. And life force made up of  the five pranas is considered just an incessant function (samanya vritti) of this antahkarana. The five bhutas or gross elements combine in various  combinations and different permutations and become the variegated universe we experience.  The spirit or purusha, the non-changing eternal consciousness tatwa,  joins the subtle body and remains with it, a mute spectator, until the yogi 'liberates' it with yoga. Until then with the subtle accumulated karma bundle and old vasanas attached to it, the subtle body transmigrates and takes a new birth and acquires a new physical body by taking the help of the bhutas of the macrocosm. There is no room for a creator principle in this rather ingenious philosophy. They are able to recognize that for the kind of experience we have, one has to explain how the subject evolves and how the objects evolve so that one can explain the kind of subject object experience we have all our life and life thereafter. They also recognize that in addition there has to be consciousness principle that experiences all life without undergoing any change. 

...continued in part 2
.................and part 3

or full newsletter here on Ramaswami's Newsletter page
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups=#!topic/vinyasa-krama-announce/mYc5xbNbOGc
------------------------------

Part 2. A Short Introduction to Yoga Philosophy from Srivatsa Ramaswami's Nov. Newsletter

I thought Ramaswami's newsletter this month was a useful introduction to Yoga philosophy but am aware too that we often read blog posts 'on the fly', here's the newsletter article divided up into three bite size pieces.
Pictures and format is mine.

Link back to Part 1
Purusha from here


Part 2

This theory of evolution is accepted by Yogis in toto. But they also subscribe to a superior Being, an Iswara, which could be of considerable use in achieving the ultimate yogic goal. They also accept worship of different personal gods (so do samkhyas) which could be venerated for various ends including peace of mind but these gods are not considered as creator. 

But added to these various theories we also have modern theories of evolution, how the universe came out of one entity called a 'singularity' very similar in concept to Samkhya's mula prakriti which evolved into this universe by a phenomenon called 'Big Bang'. Over a period of time matter particles combined variously and then the first single cell bacterium was formed, then various beings. The difference with Samkhya conceptually is that the distinct two stream evolution of Samkhyas is missing, as is  the recognition of consciousness as distinct  from inert matter. 

The evolution of different species as per Darwin finds an echo in the Puranic stories of evolution. According to the Puranas the Creator took several avatars or incarnation like the fish, representing the aquatic 'animal', then the turtle the amphibious creature. Then the 
boar, then the half man/half animal, the man-lion incarnation. Then the dwarf (vamana), the wild man (parasurama) then  the perfect man (Rama) and the divine man (Krishna). Several puranas are named after these stages of evolution-- some like Matsya (Fish), Kurma (turtle), Varaha (Boar), etc. The others are found in other puranas and itihasas like Ramayana and Mahabharata such as  Narasimha (man-lion), Vamana (dwarf), Parasurama (wild man), Rama (the perfect man) Krishna (the divine man) etc. 

Then the Upanishads or the vedanta philosophy talks about evolution from one non changing principle that alone exists, viz., Brahman the pure consciousness which has expanded into this mammoth universe. Again there are different views like, if the created universe is really real. 

All these varying theories about the evolution of the universe, ancient and modern and all the cares of worldly life blunt the childhood wonderment as one keeps muddling through life. 

The three vedic philosophies viz., Samkhya, Yoga and Vedanta form a group of philosophies that subscribe to the authority of the vedas. They are considered as essentially adhyatma vidyas or body of knowledge about one's own self. It is the view of these darsanas that all the suffering one experiences birth after birth is due to the wrong understanding about one's own self and by implication the universe itself. And perhaps the most important contribution in this respect is by the Samkhyas who explained the evolution not as one stream but as indicated earlier along two streams, the microcosmic and the macrocosmic—the subject and the object as we experience. So all these philosophies start from our present experience of each of us as the subject and the entire universe as the objects. From this standpoint they start the discussions. Samkhyas talk about the need to know the 
manifest universe(vyakta) along  with the origin of it (avyakta) and also the subject that experiences (jna). Similarly Patanjali in his Yoga talks of the subject, the experiencer (drashta)  and the object or that which is experienced, here  the chitta vritti. Adi sankara 
while writing the commentary on Brahma Sutra, the text for Vedanta philosophy, uses a similar approach. Here is how he starts his commentary, the preamble 

SELF and NOT-SELF “It is obvious that the subject and the object — that is, the Self 
(Atman) and the Not-Self, which are as different as darkness and light are — cannot be identified with each other. It is a mistake to superimpose upon the subject or Self (that is, the "I," whose nature is consciousness) the characteristics of the object or Not-"I" (which 
is non-conscious), and to superimpose the subject and its attributes on the object. Nonetheless, man has a natural tendency, rooted in ignorance (avidya), not to distinguish clearly between subject and object, although they are in fact absolutely distinct, but rather to 
superimpose upon each the characteristic nature and attributes of the other. This leads to a confusion of the Real (the Self) and the Unreal (the Not-Self) and causes us to say such incorrect  things as "I am that," "That is mine," and so on. “ 

Ultimately in the vedanta philosophy of Sankara's advaita, because it admits of only consciousness as satya or real and existent, the objects of the universe that are experienced are considered only an illusion. They explain it in so many different ways and using different examples. They explain our waking state experience of the world as no different from the dreams which while taking place inside the head appear to take place outside of us. Another example that is common among them is that of the image you see in a mirror. Even 
though there is no space or objects inside the mirror—it is flat surface-- it appears to have three dimensions and objects too.  Now let us try to see if consideration of Yoga's subject and object viz., purusha and chittavritti could lead to a similar conclusion of the advaita vedantins. 

...continued in part 3


or full newsletter here on Ramaswami's Newsletter page
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups=#!topic/vinyasa-krama-announce/mYc5xbNbOGc

----------------------------------------------



Part 3. A Short Introduction to Yoga Philosophy from Srivatsa Ramaswami's Nov. Newsletter


I thought Ramaswami's newsletter this month was a useful introduction to Yoga philosophy but am aware too that we often read blog posts 'on the fly', here's the newsletter article divided up into three bite size pieces.
Pictures and format are my additions.

Link back to Part 1
and Part 2


Namarupa 6th edition, includes Ramaswami's article 'My Studies with Sri Krishnamacharya'

Part 3

Let us take one of the chittavrittis, the pramana vritti  of which the pratyaksha vritti or the vritti of direct perception—direct perception through the senses—is one kind. When I see an object—I have talked about it in an earlier newsletter but we may go  beyond by a further 
step—light particles, rupatanmatras or rupaparamanus,, are selectively  reflected by the object and reach my eyes.  The eyes channelize the reflected particles by 
focusing on the object. The light particles reach the retina, and the retina stimulated by the sensation, sends electrical impulses through the optic nerves to the brain. Simultaneously, the objects may send sound waves or other sensations which are collected by the appropriate sense organs and transmitted to the brain. In the brain or chitta, there is a center called manas which coordinates all the information and makes a consolidated picture, which may be called  mano vritti of the chitta. Another aspect of chitta known as buddhi (mahat) 
analyzes the information, refers to memory, etc. and understands the object and 
then another aspect of the brain called ahamkara or ego adds its own color. 
It introduces feelings and emotions to the whole picture, like I love it or I do not like it or I'm totally indifferent to it. But this information in the brain  is within the brain space. This modified/interpreted picture must by seen by me, must be experienced by me in three dimensions. So the chitta projects the information not in the outside physical space 
but within the brain by creating a virtual mental space. So what I see or experience is not on the physical plane but in the mental plane called chitta akasa. To complicate matters the chitta also includes me as the experiencer of this chittavritti by positing me or my image as the one that is having  the experience. So it can be seen that my chittavritti is the totality of my experience including me Ramaswami as the experiencer of this experience. The chittavritti I experience may have three parts, one the object/s I observe, the act of observing 
and the observer or me. This three part experience is called Triputi, like grahitru. grahana. grahya in Yoga sutras. 

So whatever I experience now is my Chittavritti.. This is all I experience. Now the next moment the chittavritti changes, The object may have changed or my attention may have changed to another object, so next moment I have another chittavritti representing the objects in the physical space. So moment after moment I have chittavrittis in my mental plane or chitta akasa which alone I see even as it appears that I am experiencing the objects directly from outside. 

Let us see the chronology of events. 

At moment 1, I see an object as a chittavritti. 
At moment 2, I see another object as chittvritti. 

But the light particles of the object I see the second time are  from my previous  chittavritti. Why so? Because I only see chittavrittis, even as I feel I am seeing the object 
from the outside world through my senses as mentioned when we started the discussion. Going backwards I realize that I see objects from my previous chittavrittis, and I have no proof that the objects do really exist, for I only experience a succession of chittavrittis in the mental space(like an infinite regress) and I have no proof that they take place in the outer physical space or as the Mayavadins say that there is no proof of the existence of a world outside. There are three possibilities. One is that the universe is real which  is the belief 
of almost everyone of us. The previous discussion will show that it is indeterminate (anirvachaniya), one cannot prove  the existence of the world outside and then thirdly  the vedantins assert that there is no real creation as we understand (maya). 

What we experience takes place inside the brain or chitta as a chittavritti but appears to be outside of us. The vedantins say all that happens takes place within our consciousness but appears to take place outside of it. Each Chittavritti draws information from previous 
chittavritti and my  world, as is your world, is just a succession of chittavrittis. They further contend that even the chitta like the body is something observed or experienced by the purusha or pure consciousness and hence all that purusha/ consciousness experiences, i.e., the entire universe including me, Ramaswami, is just an illusion(maya) or rather not really real. 

The vedantins especially the advaita proponents quote the chandogya upanishad to drive home this point. :”Namarupe vyakaravani”. Nama means name-- here it represents sound and rupa is form, here it represents light. These are the two that our main senses absorb from 
the outside world for the mind to synthesize and present a picture. Namarupa the representative term, would also include the other sensations like touch, taste and smell but which are  relatively minor when compared to the other two. So what we experience are just sound- bytes and other sensations. 

Two sages once ran into each other in a celestial coffee shop. They decided to sit down and chat over a hot cup of masala chai. One was a great 
scholar of the puranas and started stressing the importance of recognizing a creator for the universe. The other argued that it is not necessary to subscribe to this view as nature is capable of evolving without a superior entity. They argued for a long time, a billion years I guess going by a vedic episode. At the end of that period both of them had exhausted their very reasoned arguments. Without anything else to say and unable to convince the other about one's own viewpoint the discussion deteriorated into angry words and 
was leading to blows, as my guru would say “Sesaham Kopena Purayet (the rest of the debate was made up of anger)”. Then the coffee shop owner who was watching the debate and wanting to close the shop for the long cosmic day, butted in and said, “Did you ever 
consider if the universe that we see was really created or just an illusion even before finding out the origin of the Universe and how it was created?' 

What is the use of all these discussions? If I am convinced this really is the truth about the subject and the object, my attitude towards myself (subject), the world around(objects) could change. Knowing the truth about oneself is a great benefit. If I, like the vedantins, come to the conclusion that the waking state worldly experience is essentially no different from the dream experience(an illusion, a make belief) I may attach the same importance 
to these worldly experiences as I would to the dream state. When I wake up, if the dream is sweet, I have a smile and if it is a nightmare I shrug it 
away –as mentioned in Chandogya Upanishad, like a horse which shrugs off the loosehairs. I do not dwell on it, not even on my dream self. No greater importance will I then tend to 
give for my worldly experiences or even to myself. I may even realize that I am really the pure unchanging consciousness and hence immortal leading to the Yogi's Kaivalya or the vedantin's moksha, which I could savor for the rest of my life. 

My mind projects what it sees 
I  see what my chitta projects 
Now I see only what the mind/consciousness projects 
Incessantly all those illusions. 

Now I may sing the popular  rhyme as follows 

Twinkle Twinkle Little Star 
How I wonder what WE are. 

Sincerely 
Srivatsa Ramaswami 


Full newsletter here on Ramaswami's Newsletter page
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups=#!topic/vinyasa-krama-announce/mYc5xbNbOGc

For more on Yoga Philosophy see Srivatsa Ramaswami's 'Yoga for the Three Stages of Life'. This is still my favourite book on Yoga, take advantage of the Amazon 'Look Inside' preview feature.

Link to Amazon.com